| :: COLLABORATION WITH :: |
QOUBA: Jurnal Pendidikan
QOUBA: Jurnal Pendidikan implements a rigorous, objective, and transparent peer review process to ensure the scientific quality, originality, and academic integrity of all published articles. The journal applies a double-blind peer review system, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the evaluation process.
All submitted manuscripts are first examined by the Editorial Board to ensure alignment with the journal’s scope and focus, compliance with author guidelines, and fulfillment of minimum academic standards. At this stage, manuscripts are also checked using plagiarism detection software. Manuscripts with a high similarity index or those that fall outside the journal’s scope will be rejected without proceeding to peer review.
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript’s subject area. The review is conducted anonymously (double-blind) to ensure objectivity and fairness.
Reviewers assess the manuscript based on the following criteria:
Originality and novelty
Relevance to educational studies
Appropriateness of theoretical framework and literature review
Rigor of research methodology and data analysis
Clarity of presentation and academic writing quality
Contribution to the advancement of educational knowledge
Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the Editor will issue one of the following decisions:
Accepted without revision
Accepted with minor revisions
Accepted with major revisions
Rejected
Authors requested to revise their manuscripts must submit the revised version along with a detailed response to reviewers’ comments within the specified deadline.
The final decision regarding publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on reviewers’ evaluations and the revised manuscript. The Editor-in-Chief holds full authority in determining the publication eligibility of a manuscript.
QOUBA: Jurnal Pendidikan adheres to international standards of publication ethics and expects all authors, reviewers, and editors to uphold academic integrity, confidentiality, and the avoidance of conflicts of interest.
Kalau Abang Hasan mau, saya bisa buatkan versi yang lebih “SINTA-ready” dengan tambahan:
review timeline (e.g., 2–6 weeks),
maximum similarity threshold (≤20%),
open access statement,
and DOI policy.
Biar halaman QOUBA makin kokoh secara akreditasi.
| :: People :: |
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewers |
| Contact |
| :: Policies :: |
| Focus and Scope |
| Peer Review Process |
| Publication Frequency |
| Open Access Policy |
| Archiving |
| Posting Article Policy |
| Publication Ethics |
| Screening for Plagiarism |
| Withdrawal of Manuscript |
| Correction and Retraction |
| Article Processing Charge |
| Indexing and Abstracting |
| :: Submission :: |
| Author Guidelines |
| Reviewer Guidelines |
| Copyright Notice |
| Privacy Statement |
| Manuscript Template |
Ensure Similarity Index
Manuscript Maximum 30%

QOUBA : Jurnal Pendidikan
Editorial Office of QOUBA : Jurnal Pendidikan | Jalan Sederhana Lorong Lambang Sari No.959, RT 001 RW. 006, Kelurahan Tembilahan Hulu Kecamatan Tembilahan Hulu, Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Provinsi Riau, Indonesia
Email : quoba-journal@hsnpublisher.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Design & Develop By : RYE EDUCATION HUB